Robotics company Ubtech Robotics Corp. Ltd. (9880.HK) announced on Wednesday that it will acquire 43% of Shenzhen-listed Zhejiang Fenglong Electric Co. Ltd. (002931.SZ) for a total consideration of about 1.67 billion yuan ($237 million).

Ubtech said it will initially acquire about 30% of Fenglong Electric through a share transfer at 17.72 yuan per share. It will then launch a tender offer for an additional 13.02% at an offer price representing a discount of about 10% to the company’s last trading price before its suspension.

Upon completion, Fenglong Electric will become Ubtech’s first subsidiary listed on China’s domestic A-share market. Ubtech will consolidate Fenglong into its own financial results, and will appoint six of the company’s seven directors.

Founded in 2003, Fenglong Electric is primarily engaged in the sale of garden machinery, hydraulic control systems and automotive components, and has returned to profitability in recent years. Ubtech said the acquisition will strengthen its supply-chain integration, cost structure and mass-production capabilities, further consolidating its competitive position in the humanoid robotics industry.

Fenglong Electric shares were suspended on Dec. 18 and resumed trading on Thursday in Shenzhen. The stock jumped by the daily maximum 10.01% to 21.65 yuan when trading resumed, giving it a market capitalization of about 4.7 billion yuan.

By Lee Shih Ta

To subscribe to Bamboo Works weekly free newsletter, click here

Recent Articles

Geneplus IPO

Geneplus locks onto targeted medicine for IPO pitch

After a post-Covid earnings dip, the company is seeking a stable future as a provider of data and diagnostics for precision medicine and disease prevention   Key Takeaways: The company’s…

Hong Kong’s IPO rally under scrutiny, as ZTE hits new U.S. headwinds

Hong Kong's stock regulator has warned IPO underwriters over the declining qualiy of new listing applications. Is this a red flag for the city's booming IPO market, or just the usual regulatory caution? And the U.S. could fine telecoms equipment maker ZTE $1 billion for bribery in Brazil. Why does Washington think it can force ZTE to pay such a large amount?