JD.com does e-commerce

After experiencing setbacks in its U.S. and U.K. listing plans, fast-fashion e-commerce platform Shein is reportedly considering moving its headquarters from Singapore back to China in a bid to secure regulatory approval for a planned Hong Kong IPO.

Shein is currently registered in Singapore and has sought legal advice on creating a parent company in China, people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg. Discussions are still preliminary and the company cannot guarantee the move will proceed, the report said.

Founded in Nanjing, Shein shifted its headquarters to Singapore in 2021 to present itself as a global company and downplay its Chinese origins. After failing to obtain regulatory approval for listings in New York and London, the company reportedlyfiled a recent confidential application to list in Hong Kong.

Despite being based outside China, the company remains subject to Mainland regulators since the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) requires all companies with substantive ties to the country to undergo a review before listing anywhere, even if they are based elsewhere.

The potential relocation could improve Shein’s chances of securing CSRC approval, partly because it would subject the company’s revenue to Chinese taxation. It would also give Chinese authorities greater oversight of Shein’s vast consumer data. Chinese regulators have required companies seeking overseas listings to undergo data security reviews since 2023.

By Lee Shih Ta

To subscribe to Bamboo Works weekly free newsletter, click here

Recent Articles

Geneplus IPO

Geneplus locks onto targeted medicine for IPO pitch

After a post-Covid earnings dip, the company is seeking a stable future as a provider of data and diagnostics for precision medicine and disease prevention   Key Takeaways: The company’s…

Hong Kong’s IPO rally under scrutiny, as ZTE hits new U.S. headwinds

Hong Kong's stock regulator has warned IPO underwriters over the declining qualiy of new listing applications. Is this a red flag for the city's booming IPO market, or just the usual regulatory caution? And the U.S. could fine telecoms equipment maker ZTE $1 billion for bribery in Brazil. Why does Washington think it can force ZTE to pay such a large amount?