0981.HK
688981.SHG
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (SMIC)(0981.HK; 688981.SH) on Thursday reported a 68.9% year-on-year drop in its third-quarter profit to $71.79 million.

The Latest: Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (SMIC)(0981.HK; 688981.SH) on Thursday reported a 68.9% year-on-year drop in its third-quarter profit to $71.79 million, as its gross margin plunged by 7.1 percentage points to 13.7%.

Looking Up: The company, whose first-quarter revenue rose 19.7% year-on-year to $1.75 billion, expects its second-quarter revenue to grow 5% to 7% from the first quarter, due to continued demand from some customers for early shipments in the second quarter.

Take Note: The company’s gross margin is expected to continue to fall to between 9% and 11% in the second quarter, as depreciation is expected to rise in line with the increase in capacity scale.

Digging Deeper: As a leading force in China’s drive to build up its chip sector, SMIC has become a lightning rod for U.S. politicians. It was placed on the U.S. Commerce Department’s “entity list,” limiting its access to U.S. technology. Japan and the Netherlands have also imposed new restrictions on their exports of advanced chip-making equipment to China, hitting companies like SMIC. SMIC’s results have suffered since last year due to unfavorable factors, and it forecasts that its gross margin will continue to face downward pressure.

Market Reaction: SMIC’s Hong Kong shares rose on Friday and closed up 2% at HK$16.34 by the midday break, near the lower end of their 52-week range.

Translation by A. Au

To subscribe to Bamboo Works weekly free newsletter, click here

Recent Articles

Geneplus IPO

Geneplus locks onto targeted medicine for IPO pitch

After a post-Covid earnings dip, the company is seeking a stable future as a provider of data and diagnostics for precision medicine and disease prevention   Key Takeaways: The company’s…

Hong Kong’s IPO rally under scrutiny, as ZTE hits new U.S. headwinds

Hong Kong's stock regulator has warned IPO underwriters over the declining qualiy of new listing applications. Is this a red flag for the city's booming IPO market, or just the usual regulatory caution? And the U.S. could fine telecoms equipment maker ZTE $1 billion for bribery in Brazil. Why does Washington think it can force ZTE to pay such a large amount?